RESOLVE — TITAN AI

Every compliance platform on the market stops at a finding. Vanta tells you the control failed. Secureframe drafts a Terraform snippet and leaves you to paste it. RESOLVE closes the loop: it holds a conversation about the problem, proposes the change, and — only with your approval — executes it inside your tenant with a snapshot to fall back on. Find → explain → recommend → fix → verify → evidence. One agent, the whole loop.

— The conversation

Plain questions. Engineered answers.

RESOLVE · session connected to your tenant · read-only until approved

you > why is the audit failing on storage encryption?

resolve > Two storage accounts accept traffic without infrastructure encryption: stg-claims-prod and stg-intake-dev. This fails HITRUST 10.f, HIPAA 164.312(a)(2)(iv), and SOC 2 CC6.7 — one gap, three frameworks. Proposed fix: enable infrastructure encryption and require secure transfer. Blast radius: zero downtime for stg-intake-dev; stg-claims-prod has 2 legacy clients on HTTP that would break — listed below.

you > fix the dev one now, schedule prod for the change window

resolve > Done. stg-intake-dev fixed and verified (config snapshot saved; re-scan confirms closure; evidence attached to the HITRUST tracker). stg-claims-prod queued for Saturday 02:00 window with rollback plan and the two client teams flagged for TLS migration. Approval link sent.

Illustrative session. RESOLVE never executes a write without an explicit approval recorded in the audit trail.

— Safe by construction

Six guardrails between a finding and any change.

Auto-remediation is only valuable if it never makes things worse. RESOLVE inherits FORGE's consent-gated execution engine and wraps every change in the same six-step discipline a senior SRE would use.

01
Read-only diagnosis firstRESOLVE investigates with Reader-level access only. It never holds write permissions during diagnosis — the conversation cannot accidentally change anything.
02
Blast-radius previewBefore proposing a fix, RESOLVE maps every resource, application, and client that depends on the thing being changed — and tells you exactly what could break, before you approve.
03
Human approval gateEvery write is consent-gated per change. Approve in the chat, the dashboard, or your ticketing tool via CONDUIT. No approval, no change — ever.
04
Snapshot before touchThe full prior configuration is captured before the change is applied. Rollback is one command — or automatic.
05
Verify after fixAfter applying, RESOLVE re-runs the exact detector that raised the finding. Fix confirmed → evidence attached. Fix not confirmed → automatic rollback to the snapshot and escalation to a human.
06
Immutable audit trailWho asked, what was proposed, who approved, what changed, what was verified — every step signed and timestamped. Your auditor reads the same trail you do.

— Coverage

Infrastructure and application. Both sides of the incident.

Azure infrastructure

The cloud layer

Public storage exposure, NSG and firewall rules, Key Vault access policies and expiring secrets, RBAC over-permissioning, missing encryption at rest and in transit, unattached disks and idle waste, Defender recommendations, Entra ID conditional-access gaps.

Fixes via ARM · consent-gated · snapshot + rollback

Application layer

The app layer

App Service misconfiguration (HTTPS-only, TLS floor, CORS wildcards), connection strings and secrets moved from app settings into Key Vault, always-on and health-check gaps, failed deployment slots, App Insights alert coverage, certificate expiry, 4xx / 5xx error-pattern diagnosis with the config change that ends them.

App Service · Functions · AKS config

Compliance loop

Fixes that file their own evidence

Every verified fix updates the COMPLY and CERTIFY trackers automatically: the HITRUST requirement flips to green, the HIPAA control gets a fresh artifact, the SOC 2 evidence pack regenerates. Remediation and audit-prep stop being two projects.

COMPLY · CERTIFY · AUDIT integration

Escalation

Knows what it should not touch

Production databases, stateful migrations, anything with an unclear blast radius — RESOLVE drafts the runbook and routes it to a human instead of acting. The line between “safe to automate” and “needs an engineer” is a policy you control, not a guess the model makes.

Policy-driven autonomy levels 0–3

— Versus the market

Everyone detects. One platform resolves.

Platform	Finds the issue	Recommends the fix	Applies, verifies, rolls back
TITAN RESOLVE	Yes · conversational	Yes · with blast radius	Yes · consent-gated, snapshot, auto-rollback
Compliance-automation platforms	Yes · failed-control alerts	Generic guidance	No — detection only
IaC-snippet assistants	Yes	Copy-paste Terraform	No — you paste, you own the outcome
MSP / consultants	Quarterly	In a report	Weeks later, billed hourly

Ask it anything. It fixes what it finds.